The global halal industry has evolved into a broad economic sector encompassing food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and services. This development has increased the demand for halal certification systems that not only ensure compliance with Islamic law but also achieve international credibility and recognition. Halal certification is not merely an administrative procedure; it represents the application of Sharia principles in modern economic activities, including consumer protection and ethical business practices.

In this context, halal auditors play a strategic role in verifying compliance throughout production chains. However, the qualifications of halal auditors are not uniform and are influenced by legal, social, and religious factors in different jurisdictions. Therefore, it is important to understand how halal auditors are classified and how a balance between religious and professional requirements is established.

Theoretical Framework: Dual Dimensions of Halal Auditing

The classification of halal auditors can be analyzed through two primary dimensions:

1. Religious Dimension (Sharia Compliance)
   This dimension emphasizes the auditor’s ability to understand and apply Islamic legal principles, such as halal–haram, najis (impurity), and istihalah (substance transformation). In many halal certification systems, this aspect is closely linked to religious authority.
2. Professional Dimension (Technical Competence)
   This dimension includes auditing skills, objectivity, independence, and knowledge of production processes and supply chains, as emphasized in international standards.

These two dimensions demonstrate that halal auditing is a multidisciplinary process that integrates normative-religious and technical-professional aspects.

Variations in Approaches to Halal Auditor Requirements

In global practice, different approaches to halal auditor requirements can be identified through several general patterns:

First, there are systems that prioritize religious legitimacy as a primary requirement, where halal auditors are required to possess a specific religious identity. This approach is typically found in systems where religious authority is integrated into state or certification structures, and halal auditing is regarded as part of Islamic legal authority.

Second, there are systems that adopt a hybrid approach, in which technical auditors may come from diverse backgrounds, while Sharia experts or religious auditors remain involved in the decision-making process. This approach allows flexibility in human resource utilization without neglecting Sharia compliance.

Third, there are systems that emphasize professional competence, particularly in contexts where Muslims represent a minority population. In such models, non-Muslim auditors may participate in technical aspects, while Sharia validation is ensured through consultative mechanisms or advisory boards.

These variations indicate that halal auditor requirements are not universal but rather adaptive to local contexts.

International Standards and Their Limitations

At the global level, ISO/IEC 17065 provides a general framework for certification bodies of products, processes, and services. The standard emphasizes principles such as competence, independence, impartiality, and consistency in certification processes.

However, as a general framework, ISO/IEC 17065 does not address religious aspects. This highlights a fundamental limitation of international standards in accommodating religion-based certification schemes such as halal. Consequently, many halal certification systems incorporate additional requirements that reflect Sharia values.

Classification of Halal Auditors

Based on conceptual analysis, halal auditors can be classified into three main categories:

1. Sharia Auditors
   Responsible for ensuring compliance with Islamic law and providing normative judgments regarding the halal status of products.
2. Technical Auditors
   Responsible for examining production processes, raw materials, and quality management systems.
3. Integrated Auditors
   Combine both Sharia and technical competencies within a single role, commonly found in more established systems.

This classification reflects the need for both specialization and integration within halal auditing processes.

Discussion: Challenges of Global Harmonization

The diversity of halal auditor requirements reflects the plurality of legal and cultural systems. On one hand, these differences may hinder cross-border recognition of halal certification. On the other hand, they represent legitimate adaptations to local socio-religious contexts.

Academic literature suggests that harmonization should not aim for absolute standardization but rather for interoperability. This means that different systems can be mutually recognized as long as they adhere to shared fundamental principles, both in professional and religious aspects.

The integration of international standards with national halal requirements is therefore essential in developing a credible and inclusive global halal certification system.

Conclusion

The classification and requirements of halal auditors are shaped by the interaction between religious authority and professional standards. International frameworks such as ISO/IEC 17065 provide a foundation for technical competence, while halal systems incorporate religious dimensions to ensure Sharia compliance.

There is no single universal model for halal auditing. Instead, existing systems are contextual and adaptive. Therefore, the future development of the global halal industry depends on achieving a balance between professional standardization and religious legitimacy, ensuring broad acceptance without compromising Sharia authenticity.

– Written by Naflah –

References 

Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal. (2023). Sistem jaminan produk halal di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPJPH.

Ikhwan, I. (2023). Systematic review on Indonesia halal certification. Ekonomi Islam Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.58968/eii.v6i2.554

International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO/IEC 17065: Conformity assessment—Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services. Geneva: ISO.

Lahuri, S., Pranoto, M. R., Kamaluddin, I., Syamsuri, S., & Cahyo, E. N. (2024). Halal certification governance in Indonesia: An Islamic legal appraisal based on maṣlaḥah principles. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah). https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.15411

Maulana, M., Sapa, N. B., Galib, M., & Muthiadin, C. (2025). Halal certification process in Indonesia from the perspective of regulators and industry practitioners. Muttaqien: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52593/mtq.06.1.01

Ohgata, S. (2024). What is required of halal standards and halal certification systems in the global era? Islam Nusantara Journal, 5(2).

Rahmawati, A., & Hasan, N. F. (2024). Standardization of halal certification processes in Indonesia and Malaysia. Krigan: Journal of Management and Sharia Business, 2(2).

Zaharah, R., Azhar, N. A. A., Faizal, L., Santoso, R., & Satria, I. (2024). Halal industry: A comparative analysis of halal certification mechanisms in Indonesia and Malaysia. ASAS, 16(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v16i2.23994